Alp in Men's Health magazine. Read it here: https://www.menshealth.com/health/a69730859/tucker-carlson-nicotine-interview
Photo credit: Christaan Felber
Photo credit: Christaan Felber
โค643๐413๐ฅด96๐คฎ66๐คก56๐คทโโ28๐ฅฐ23๐23๐ฅ19๐คฉ8๐ฆ8
Now that we're telling the truth about why nations do what they do, a lot of the arguments that we have relied upon, in fact, that have been the basis of a lot of our foreign policy positions, are now moot.
So once you say out loud, โwe're grabbing Venezuela because we're annoyed they're selling what is our oil to the Chinese, our rival,โ once you just say that out loudโand again, it's good to be honestโbut once you are honest, it's kind of hard to make the case that, well, for example, Russia doesn't have an interest in what happens in eastern Ukraine. It's hard to scold Putin for moving into Ukraine. Here's a great power threatened on its border, and it takes action to protect itself. And we've been calling that an unprovoked invasion. The Biden administration called that. The State Department still calls it that. And our policy is based on the idea that this is illegitimate. And that's why we've been waging a proxy war against Russia for four years. You can't really make that argument anymore. How is it wrong for a great power like Russia to protect itself? Well, under the rules that we're now operating under, it's not wrong. You can say, I don't prefer it, but you can't point to some abstract principle and say it's absolutely wrong.
Why would it be wrong for China to retake Taiwan? The U.S. government already acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. We have a so-called one China policy, and yet simultaneously we suggest we would defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression. But wait a second, Taiwan is Han Chinese. Same people, same language. Tons of cultural similarities. We want the microchips in Taiwan. We hope it doesn't happen because it would give China greater leverage over the United States. But as a matter of principle, can you really say it's wrong for China to reunify with Taiwan? No, you can't say that anymore.
All you can say is we will try to prevent it if we can, but we can't appeal to any higher authority. Now, some will say that higher authority was made up. Well, it certainly was made up. That principle was the basis of the entire fabled post-war order. What was the post- war order? It was based on one idea: it is wrong for bigger countries to swallow up smaller countries just because they want to. That's why we declared war against Germany when they went into Poland. But weirdly we did not declare war against the Soviet Union when they did the same thing the same day.
But whatever, the point is big countries are not allowed to act in a predatory way towards smaller countries because that's wrong. And there's always been, as noted, tons of fakery around that, of course, tons of pretending and pretense, we're all wearing a veil to hide our true motives. But that has still been the basis of the way countries deal with each other. And that is no longer the case as of last week because the world's great superpower, the United States, just acted purely in its own interest and said so out loud.
So where does it leave all these international bodies? The UN most famously, but all of them. The World Health Organization. How about NATO? Do they have any authority at all? Is there a reason to have them once we stop pretending? Probably not. They may not know that yet. And of course they're all very well funded and will live on into the future to some extent. But basically they're dead men walking. They're over. That's all over.
Watch the full monologue here: https://youtu.be/7HgM0aI3IK8
So once you say out loud, โwe're grabbing Venezuela because we're annoyed they're selling what is our oil to the Chinese, our rival,โ once you just say that out loudโand again, it's good to be honestโbut once you are honest, it's kind of hard to make the case that, well, for example, Russia doesn't have an interest in what happens in eastern Ukraine. It's hard to scold Putin for moving into Ukraine. Here's a great power threatened on its border, and it takes action to protect itself. And we've been calling that an unprovoked invasion. The Biden administration called that. The State Department still calls it that. And our policy is based on the idea that this is illegitimate. And that's why we've been waging a proxy war against Russia for four years. You can't really make that argument anymore. How is it wrong for a great power like Russia to protect itself? Well, under the rules that we're now operating under, it's not wrong. You can say, I don't prefer it, but you can't point to some abstract principle and say it's absolutely wrong.
Why would it be wrong for China to retake Taiwan? The U.S. government already acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. We have a so-called one China policy, and yet simultaneously we suggest we would defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression. But wait a second, Taiwan is Han Chinese. Same people, same language. Tons of cultural similarities. We want the microchips in Taiwan. We hope it doesn't happen because it would give China greater leverage over the United States. But as a matter of principle, can you really say it's wrong for China to reunify with Taiwan? No, you can't say that anymore.
All you can say is we will try to prevent it if we can, but we can't appeal to any higher authority. Now, some will say that higher authority was made up. Well, it certainly was made up. That principle was the basis of the entire fabled post-war order. What was the post- war order? It was based on one idea: it is wrong for bigger countries to swallow up smaller countries just because they want to. That's why we declared war against Germany when they went into Poland. But weirdly we did not declare war against the Soviet Union when they did the same thing the same day.
But whatever, the point is big countries are not allowed to act in a predatory way towards smaller countries because that's wrong. And there's always been, as noted, tons of fakery around that, of course, tons of pretending and pretense, we're all wearing a veil to hide our true motives. But that has still been the basis of the way countries deal with each other. And that is no longer the case as of last week because the world's great superpower, the United States, just acted purely in its own interest and said so out loud.
So where does it leave all these international bodies? The UN most famously, but all of them. The World Health Organization. How about NATO? Do they have any authority at all? Is there a reason to have them once we stop pretending? Probably not. They may not know that yet. And of course they're all very well funded and will live on into the future to some extent. But basically they're dead men walking. They're over. That's all over.
Watch the full monologue here: https://youtu.be/7HgM0aI3IK8
๐1.35K๐ฏ947โค441๐ฅ140๐ฉ47๐คก42๐คฎ29๐13๐คฃ11๐พ11โคโ๐ฅ10
What would it take for the US to rethink its relationship with Russia? Putin advisor Sergey Karaganov gives us the Russian perspective. Watch live tonight at 6 PM ET on TuckerCarlson.com.
โค971๐687๐199๐ฅ78๐ค67๐คก53๐23๐ฉ21๐คฎ17๐12๐11
Thirty years ago William F. Buckley banished Peter Brimelow from Con Inc. for saying that immigration was destroying the country. Turns out Brimelow was right: https://youtu.be/zI3xsvH7b6U
๐ฅ917๐509๐ฏ395โค114๐32๐ค22โคโ๐ฅ12๐คช12๐8๐5๐ฆ4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The West isnโt just tolerating mass migration. Our governments are funding it.
In our new documentary Replacing Europe: Following the Worldโs Deadliest Migration Route, our cameras uncover what no one wants you to see, speaking directly with migrants, locals, and officials who quietly admit what the public is never told.
Watch it now only on TuckerCarlson.com.
In our new documentary Replacing Europe: Following the Worldโs Deadliest Migration Route, our cameras uncover what no one wants you to see, speaking directly with migrants, locals, and officials who quietly admit what the public is never told.
Watch it now only on TuckerCarlson.com.
๐1.15K๐ฅ502๐คฌ210โค115๐57๐39๐คฏ27๐13๐คก10๐ฆ10โคโ๐ฅ8
According to Don Lemon, white Christians are racist for complaining when screaming lunatics threaten them in church. Tonight weโre joined by one of the pastors heโs slandering. Watch live at 6 PM ET on TuckerCarlson.com.
๐884๐ฅ321๐คฌ214๐คก105๐91โค44๐30๐ฉ23๐คฎ15๐10๐ฆ6
Europe is being invaded and destroyed by Africa, in a crime orchestrated by global leaders. A new TCN documentary shows how itโs happening: https://youtu.be/K_2_7fxyIEI
๐ฏ1.21K๐420โค157๐ฅ83๐58๐ค36๐ฉ35๐ญ32๐25๐16๐ค9
Let's talk about what exactly is going on in the United States, and why it's led to the battles in, say, Minneapolis. What's happening in the United States is a wholesale change of who lives here. Total demographic change.
Now, some have called this replacement. And the question is, is it really replacement? So we thought we would look it up.
If you were someone following along at home, trying to figure out, you know, what is everyone so mad about? What is this great replacement theory? You might go, as almost everybody does, first to Google and just type in โgreat replacement theoryโ and AI would come up with the following result. This is hot off Google AI. Here's what it says if you look up โgreat replacementโ on Google.
We're quoting: โthe great replacement theory is a debunked,โ meaning untrue, โfar right,โ meaning Nazi, โwhite nationalist,โ meaning racist, โconspiracy claiming that white populations, particularly in Europe and the US, are being deliberately replaced by non-white immigrants and minorities, often orchestrated by replacist elites leading to demographic shifts and cultural erosion, fueling extremist violence and anti-immigrant sentiment.โ
That's one sentence, by the way, a run-on sentence, but it is AI. And it's quite a sentence. And it tells you point blank, โthis is not true.โ Anyone who believes in it is deranged and is stoking violence simply by believing in it.
And it goes on to explain how this works: the theory โposits that mass migration, declining white birth rates, and political agendas by elites are intentionally replacing white populations. It has inspired numerous acts of mass murder and violence with perpetrators often citing this theory. Research shows that endorsers of the great replacement theory often hold anti-social traits, authoritarian views, and negative attitudes toward minorities and immigrants.โ
In other words, once again, believing that the population of this or any other country is being manipulated by people in power and the people who were born here are being replaced by people who weren'tโbelieving that is not only wrong, it's misinformation, it has been debunked, it's also dangerous. You can kill people by believing that.
Well, how does that work exactly? It doesn't sound like a cool objective analysis of the theory of replacement. It sounds instead like, well, a political screed, but maybe even more than that, it sounds like an article of religious faith. You're not allowed to believe this. Only bad people believe it. It's apostasy.
Watch the full monologue here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK0bJPE9PxM
Now, some have called this replacement. And the question is, is it really replacement? So we thought we would look it up.
If you were someone following along at home, trying to figure out, you know, what is everyone so mad about? What is this great replacement theory? You might go, as almost everybody does, first to Google and just type in โgreat replacement theoryโ and AI would come up with the following result. This is hot off Google AI. Here's what it says if you look up โgreat replacementโ on Google.
We're quoting: โthe great replacement theory is a debunked,โ meaning untrue, โfar right,โ meaning Nazi, โwhite nationalist,โ meaning racist, โconspiracy claiming that white populations, particularly in Europe and the US, are being deliberately replaced by non-white immigrants and minorities, often orchestrated by replacist elites leading to demographic shifts and cultural erosion, fueling extremist violence and anti-immigrant sentiment.โ
That's one sentence, by the way, a run-on sentence, but it is AI. And it's quite a sentence. And it tells you point blank, โthis is not true.โ Anyone who believes in it is deranged and is stoking violence simply by believing in it.
And it goes on to explain how this works: the theory โposits that mass migration, declining white birth rates, and political agendas by elites are intentionally replacing white populations. It has inspired numerous acts of mass murder and violence with perpetrators often citing this theory. Research shows that endorsers of the great replacement theory often hold anti-social traits, authoritarian views, and negative attitudes toward minorities and immigrants.โ
In other words, once again, believing that the population of this or any other country is being manipulated by people in power and the people who were born here are being replaced by people who weren'tโbelieving that is not only wrong, it's misinformation, it has been debunked, it's also dangerous. You can kill people by believing that.
Well, how does that work exactly? It doesn't sound like a cool objective analysis of the theory of replacement. It sounds instead like, well, a political screed, but maybe even more than that, it sounds like an article of religious faith. You're not allowed to believe this. Only bad people believe it. It's apostasy.
Watch the full monologue here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK0bJPE9PxM
๐959๐ฏ600โค332๐68๐45๐คก36๐ฉ22๐15๐14๐13๐ฆ7
Our emergency response: https://youtu.be/4rULvcS5X8U
๐365๐118โค51๐ฆ23๐ฅ20โคโ๐ฅ10๐คก10๐7๐ค6๐ฉ6๐คฃ4
Most Americans just want to live in a sovereign country that cares about them. Thatโs not a partisan position. Itโs a baseline demand. Cenk Uygur explains: https://youtu.be/OOs0Kpj0g1w
๐1.13Kโค326๐คก129๐ฏ125๐ฅ66๐คฎ65๐20๐12๐ฆ12๐ค9โก7
The people who run countries believe in the supernatural. Itโs the main thing they believe in. Why do they try so hard to convince the rest of us itโs not real? AJ Gentile on giants, the pyramids and remote viewing: https://youtu.be/3EAYlgYB2ko
โค694๐458๐ฅ125๐ฏ77๐คก33๐ฅด26๐ฆ20๐16โคโ๐ฅ12๐5๐2
Ian Carroll is joining our Friday show to discuss the latest Epstein files drop. Submit your questions for us by midnight ET here: https://tuckercarlson.com/epstein-files-questions
๐611โค507๐430๐ฉ136๐คก98๐ฅ78๐ฅฐ20๐20๐คช18๐คฎ7๐ฆ5
Ray Dalio on how to prevent another American civil war: https://youtu.be/-eskzPuh_5w
โค494๐362๐ฅ75๐58๐ค33๐ฅฑ23๐13๐ด12โคโ๐ฅ11๐ฏ6๐ฆ1
Join us on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/add/tuckercarlsonsc
Snapchat
Tucker Carlson op Snapchat
Tucker Carlson zit op Snapchat.
๐417๐157โค119๐37๐คก37๐ฆ14๐ฏ13๐12๐ข12๐คฎ11๐ฉ7
Technology stole your privacy, and with it your freedom. Yannik Schrade has a plan to get it back: https://youtu.be/crp-mkI1tj4
โค642๐406๐ฅ85๐ฏ79๐54๐19๐15๐8๐8๐7๐ฆ4
Listen to Texas congressional candidate Ryan Zink recount how he was treated by federal law enforcement, and imagine if that happened to you. It could: https://youtu.be/QAL6hcjIN_8
๐649โค190๐68โคโ๐ฅ45๐ค43๐คก21๐ฅ18๐คช11๐ฆ11๐4๐3