According to Don Lemon, white Christians are racist for complaining when screaming lunatics threaten them in church. Tonight we’re joined by one of the pastors he’s slandering. Watch live at 6 PM ET on TuckerCarlson.com.

Europe is being invaded and destroyed by Africa, in a crime orchestrated by global leaders. A new TCN documentary shows how it’s happening: https://youtu.be/K_2_7fxyIEI

Let's talk about what exactly is going on in the United States, and why it's led to the battles in, say, Minneapolis. What's happening in the United States is a wholesale change of who lives here. Total demographic change.

Now, some have called this replacement. And the question is, is it really replacement? So we thought we would look it up.

If you were someone following along at home, trying to figure out, you know, what is everyone so mad about? What is this great replacement theory? You might go, as almost everybody does, first to Google and just type in “great replacement theory” and AI would come up with the following result. This is hot off Google AI. Here's what it says if you look up “great replacement” on Google.

We're quoting: “the great replacement theory is a debunked,” meaning untrue, “far right,” meaning Nazi, “white nationalist,” meaning racist, “conspiracy claiming that white populations, particularly in Europe and the US, are being deliberately replaced by non-white immigrants and minorities, often orchestrated by replacist elites leading to demographic shifts and cultural erosion, fueling extremist violence and anti-immigrant sentiment.”

That's one sentence, by the way, a run-on sentence, but it is AI. And it's quite a sentence. And it tells you point blank, “this is not true.” Anyone who believes in it is deranged and is stoking violence simply by believing in it.

And it goes on to explain how this works: the theory “posits that mass migration, declining white birth rates, and political agendas by elites are intentionally replacing white populations. It has inspired numerous acts of mass murder and violence with perpetrators often citing this theory. Research shows that endorsers of the great replacement theory often hold anti-social traits, authoritarian views, and negative attitudes toward minorities and immigrants.”

In other words, once again, believing that the population of this or any other country is being manipulated by people in power and the people who were born here are being replaced by people who weren't—believing that is not only wrong, it's misinformation, it has been debunked, it's also dangerous. You can kill people by believing that.

Well, how does that work exactly? It doesn't sound like a cool objective analysis of the theory of replacement. It sounds instead like, well, a political screed, but maybe even more than that, it sounds like an article of religious faith. You're not allowed to believe this. Only bad people believe it. It's apostasy.

Watch the full monologue here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK0bJPE9PxM

Our emergency response: https://youtu.be/4rULvcS5X8U

Most Americans just want to live in a sovereign country that cares about them. That’s not a partisan position. It’s a baseline demand. Cenk Uygur explains: https://youtu.be/OOs0Kpj0g1w

The people who run countries believe in the supernatural. It’s the main thing they believe in. Why do they try so hard to convince the rest of us it’s not real? AJ Gentile on giants, the pyramids and remote viewing: https://youtu.be/3EAYlgYB2ko

Ian Carroll is joining our Friday show to discuss the latest Epstein files drop. Submit your questions for us by midnight ET here: https://tuckercarlson.com/epstein-files-questions

Ray Dalio on how to prevent another American civil war: https://youtu.be/-eskzPuh_5w

Join us on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/add/tuckercarlsonsc

Technology stole your privacy, and with it your freedom. Yannik Schrade has a plan to get it back: https://youtu.be/crp-mkI1tj4

Listen to Texas congressional candidate Ryan Zink recount how he was treated by federal law enforcement, and imagine if that happened to you. It could: https://youtu.be/QAL6hcjIN_8

Greetings from Israel.

How does Israel treat Christians? We spoke to one whose family has lived there since Jesus. His story is shocking: https://youtu.be/M5kcYlyyMcc

The Mike Huckabee interview, and the truth about America’s deeply unhealthy relationship with Israel: https://youtu.be/XS7itdfgNnU

One of the most impressive politicians of this era is running for governor in Iowa. His name is Zach Lahn. Watch this: https://youtu.be/8m5S01u7z5c

People you thought you trusted are partnering with bad actors in the gold industry to scam you. We're exposing all of it. Watch The Great Gold Scam now only on TuckerCarlson.com.

Eternal God, in whose perfect kingdom no sword is drawn but the sword of righteousness, no strength known but the strength of love: So mightily spread abroad your Spirit, that all peoples may be gathered under the banner of the Prince of Peace, as children of one God; to whom be dominion and glory, now and for ever. Amen.

- John Henry Newman

The first heavily publicized move by the United States military and the Israeli military in this conflict was to kill the head of state of Iran, the 86-year-old Ayatollah, replaced by his son, who's apparently more anti-Western than he was, so I guess strictly speaking, that wasn't very effective.

But if you take three steps back, and no one did because everyone's busy denouncing him as Hitler and the most evil man in the world and we're so grateful he's dead, when was the last time the United States military or working in conjunction with the Israeli military, killed the head of a world religion? Is that wise?

It's not because we agree with all the world's religions, it's not an endorsement of Shia Islam to say maybe we should pause before killing its 86-year-old leader. It is instead an acknowledgement that that might have consequences that affect the United States and Europe and the world, but particularly the United States, since we are the United States and we have children and hope to have grandchildren, and what will be the downstream effects for them when you kill a religious leader? Did killing the religious leader cripple their command and control structure? Were they unable to launch missiles and drones when we killed the 86-year-old Ayatollah? No. Because he knew he was gonna be killed. That's why he stayed above ground, apparently. He wanted to be martyred.

Now, why would he wanna be martyred? Maybe because he wanted a religious war.

Why did we kill him? Maybe because we wanted a religious war.
Now, why would we want that? Why would the Israelis who got us into this war, everyone admits that now, sorry, why would they want that? I don't know. Think about what would happen if this war leads to the destruction of the Dome on the Rock and the Al-Aqsa complex on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem. And we'll explain in a second how that could happen. A war that began with the killing of the head of Shia Islam. What would happen?
Well, here are the numbers. There are about 15 and a half million Jews in the world total. There are 2.5 billion Christians and there are about 2 billion Muslims. So whatever happens next is not going to be a fight between the Muslims and the Jews, because 2 billion versus 15 million, not much of a fight.

This is likely to be, if not brought under control immediately, or maybe it's too late, a war, a religious war, the one that Lindsey Graham described, between Muslims and Christians. And it's not going to play out in the Middle East because this is a regional conflict, but it's a global conflict where every big power has a stake in what happens. This will play out globally, and it'll play out in our cities. Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the United States. There are not that many Muslims in the U.S. What, five million or something like that? But it's the fastest-growing religion. That's enough to cause problems.

For sure, in Europe, 65 million Muslims, the second biggest religion in every European country, fastest growing in every country. Australia, same thing. Second-biggest, fastest-growing. New Zealand, same thing. Second-biggest, fastest-growing. Canada, same thing. What happens in all those countries? Those Christian, Western, white countries. What happens there? If there's the religious war that Lindsey Graham and clearly the Israeli government and some in our government are hoping for, what happens? Those countries suffer more than they have suffered.

Watch the full monologue here: https://youtu.be/gHrFcBeB7Lw

Pray that the spell breaks and the world is saved.

If you're a bystander to a war and happen to get caught up in it like the Gulf States are right now, no one is going to protect you. These security guarantees, formal and informal, are not real. Downtown Dubai can still get destroyed and your economy destroyed for a generation, because who's going to stop it? You're on your own. So countries that feel they're sincerely on their own have every incentive to have the most effective deterrence possible. And that would at this point be nuclear weapons.

So you're going to see a lot more nuclear-armed states in the next few years without question. So if the point of this was to preserve the status quo on nukes, it had the opposite effect. But the point of this was not to preserve the status quo at all. It was to overturn the status quo, to usher in a new age. That's the point of this war. This is a pivot in history, and a lot of the people supporting it know that.

Now they're really in two groups.

One are people motivated by religious impulse that would include some Israelis, some religious Jews. Not all, but some. And that would include some Christians, Christian Zionists. And both groups believe that they're helping to accelerate the end of history. Armageddon, the end of time, the return of the Messiah, you know, however you want to describe it. But both groups believe that history is linear. It began in one place and arrives at another with the return of God to earth. And then history ends and we are redeemed or damned, depending. So that's the basic idea.

And both of these groups seem under the impression that they can force God's hand, that they can bring this about through an act of will or violence, which is to say, both groups believe on some level that they are God, which they are not. They're not in charge of history. And you can't force God's hand. He's in charge. You are not. But both groups have lost sight of that.

So that's their motive. And then there are secular boosters of the war, promoters of the war, planners of the war. And their vision, while not strictly speaking religious, is not really so different. They would like to usher in rule by technology, whether that's mass surveillance, whether it's transhumanism, the merging of man and machine, but the rule of the earth by technology. And there are a lot of people who want this, and a lot of people who think it's inevitable.

And this is the moment where that age of history begins with this war. So again, this is not a war that is confined to the region. This is not a war between the United States and Israel and Iran. This is not a war designed to prevent a rogue state from getting nukes. It was never that. This is a war designed to usher in a new age of man, a new period in history, a new world.

And so wars like that are fundamentally theological in nature. That's theology, whether it's secular or religious, it's still theology. These are articles of faith. This is an eschatology. And wars like that aren't resolved quickly, because we're talking not just about disarming a madman. We're talking about changing the nature of life on this planet forever.

Watch the full monologue here: https://youtu.be/bET0_ROWVAw