A college kid, Austin Franco, told Jewish tech company founder Gabe Einhorn that he "didn't want to work for a Jew" after being accepted for a job at Einhorn's identity verification company, VryfID.
Einhorn then doxed Austin by posting his private email correspondence on Twitter. Initially, the screenshot contained Austin's full dox, but Einhorn must have realized this would be a bad look and he quickly edited the post to redact Austin's surname only.
In response to Einhorn's post, a Jewish woman said that her son "doesn't want to work for a goy," to which Einhorn enthusiastically replied "message me!!"
Austin was soon fully doxed (again) by Joe Lonsdale, the Jewish founder of Palantir, who accused Einhorn of being "an utter coward" for not posting the full dox.
A senior DOJ official said he wanted to make "the Jew Hater" unhireable, and the mainstream media have since written hit pieces on Austin.
Austin doubled down on twitter: "the reactions by your community only serves to further prove my point."
Einhorn then doxed Austin by posting his private email correspondence on Twitter. Initially, the screenshot contained Austin's full dox, but Einhorn must have realized this would be a bad look and he quickly edited the post to redact Austin's surname only.
In response to Einhorn's post, a Jewish woman said that her son "doesn't want to work for a goy," to which Einhorn enthusiastically replied "message me!!"
Austin was soon fully doxed (again) by Joe Lonsdale, the Jewish founder of Palantir, who accused Einhorn of being "an utter coward" for not posting the full dox.
A senior DOJ official said he wanted to make "the Jew Hater" unhireable, and the mainstream media have since written hit pieces on Austin.
Austin doubled down on twitter: "the reactions by your community only serves to further prove my point."
While Jewish PR is the lowest it has been in decades, you'd think their Ashkenazi IQs would preclude them from collectively sperging out and creating national scandals from throwaway comments, but they just can't help themselves.
Austin Franco is correct that Jews lashing out in disproportionate and cruel ways does vindicate their anti-semitic critics, and I doubt that it appeals to those who are Jew-neutral. The philo-semites will clap like seals, as always, but their numbers are dwindling, particularly among younger generations.
As Jews' reputation and influence continue to decline, I imagine their collective behavior will only become more tribalistic, paranoid, and vindictive. The problem for Whites is that Jewish influence is largely declining due to the browning of America and the importation of equally tribalistic and vindictive foreigners.
Austin Franco is correct that Jews lashing out in disproportionate and cruel ways does vindicate their anti-semitic critics, and I doubt that it appeals to those who are Jew-neutral. The philo-semites will clap like seals, as always, but their numbers are dwindling, particularly among younger generations.
As Jews' reputation and influence continue to decline, I imagine their collective behavior will only become more tribalistic, paranoid, and vindictive. The problem for Whites is that Jewish influence is largely declining due to the browning of America and the importation of equally tribalistic and vindictive foreigners.
Telegram
Thuletide
A college kid, Austin Franco, told Jewish tech company founder Gabe Einhorn that he "didn't want to work for a Jew" after being accepted for a job at Einhorn's identity verification company, VryfID.
Einhorn then doxed Austin by posting his private email…
Einhorn then doxed Austin by posting his private email…
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Migrant welfare usage in the United States, by legal status, race, national origin, employment status, and education level (2021-2025 data).
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-NonCitizens-Across-States-US
https://cis.org/Report/NonCitizen-Use-Welfare-Region-and-Country-Birth
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-Immigrants-and-USBorn-2024
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-NonCitizens-Across-States-US
https://cis.org/Report/NonCitizen-Use-Welfare-Region-and-Country-Birth
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-Immigrants-and-USBorn-2024
Digital Panopticon Update: UK government plans to ban social media for under 16s and install government spyware on every single phone.
Enforcing a social media ban will obviously require the entire adult population to have some form of digital identity, to submit biometric data, etc. (BBC). The UK government also plans to restrict VPN usage via same methods.
Australia's under 16 social media ban strategically omitted BlueSky and Tumblr, havens for marxist pedophiles and transgender groomers. Expect Britain to do the same.
Starmer says UK will go further than Australia, hit noncompliant social media platforms with multi-million dollar fines. However, UK gov will not target WhatsApp and Signal, presumably because the state uses the latter. (AP).
Not that this matters, because the UK plans to put spyware on every single phone that will allow them to scan every single message, photo, and video (Reclaim The Net).
Britain is a rogue communist state and the Trump administration should treat it as such.
Enforcing a social media ban will obviously require the entire adult population to have some form of digital identity, to submit biometric data, etc. (BBC). The UK government also plans to restrict VPN usage via same methods.
Australia's under 16 social media ban strategically omitted BlueSky and Tumblr, havens for marxist pedophiles and transgender groomers. Expect Britain to do the same.
Starmer says UK will go further than Australia, hit noncompliant social media platforms with multi-million dollar fines. However, UK gov will not target WhatsApp and Signal, presumably because the state uses the latter. (AP).
Not that this matters, because the UK plans to put spyware on every single phone that will allow them to scan every single message, photo, and video (Reclaim The Net).
Britain is a rogue communist state and the Trump administration should treat it as such.
Article summarizing recent digital censorship laws in the UK (written from the perspective of website owners): https://appinventiv.com/blog/uk-social-media-compliance-under-16/
There is far more justification for a US invasion of Britain than any Middle Eastern country since the Gulf War.
Were leftists to win power in the next British election, the country's fate as a nuclear-armed Islamo-Communist state will be sealed. Such a regime would be a direct threat to America and, in many ways, leftist Britain already is a threat to America, with their constant attacks on American companies and citizens' sovereignty.
A second British civil war is unlikely, especially if the technocratic surveillance-censorship regime implanted by the Starmer government is not overturned. So, the only plausible way to liberate Britain would be foreign intervention.
I hope the Trump administration and US military leadership have developed a long-term plan to deal with this eventuality.
I cannot overstate how dangerous it is for America to have a nuclear-armed Woke North Korea across the Atlantic. British leftists are incredibly anti-American and the Muslims that Britain imports en masse are even more so.
Were leftists to win power in the next British election, the country's fate as a nuclear-armed Islamo-Communist state will be sealed. Such a regime would be a direct threat to America and, in many ways, leftist Britain already is a threat to America, with their constant attacks on American companies and citizens' sovereignty.
A second British civil war is unlikely, especially if the technocratic surveillance-censorship regime implanted by the Starmer government is not overturned. So, the only plausible way to liberate Britain would be foreign intervention.
I hope the Trump administration and US military leadership have developed a long-term plan to deal with this eventuality.
I cannot overstate how dangerous it is for America to have a nuclear-armed Woke North Korea across the Atlantic. British leftists are incredibly anti-American and the Muslims that Britain imports en masse are even more so.
National security risks aside: The rights violations and atrocities committed by the British state against the British people are more than enough justification to invade Britain. Protecting human rights has been the pretext for every war in recent American history, and the British people have infinitely more value than the MENA goat herders America ostensibly fought to save from tin pot dictators.
The grooming gang epidemic alone easily fits the official definition of genocide, and when you factor in the great replacement, two-tier suppression of natives, rampant corruption of police, bureaucrats, politicians, and intelligence services, etc., it is obvious that modern Britain is the most evil state in Western history.
The grooming gang epidemic alone easily fits the official definition of genocide, and when you factor in the great replacement, two-tier suppression of natives, rampant corruption of police, bureaucrats, politicians, and intelligence services, etc., it is obvious that modern Britain is the most evil state in Western history.
Telegram
Thuletide
There is far more justification for a US invasion of Britain than any Middle Eastern country since the Gulf War.
Were leftists to win power in the next British election, the country's fate as a nuclear-armed Islamo-Communist state will be sealed. Such a…
Were leftists to win power in the next British election, the country's fate as a nuclear-armed Islamo-Communist state will be sealed. Such a…
In Britain, 16 year olds can work, pay taxes, join the military, consent to sex, get married (with parental permission), drive, etc., but apparently using tiktok is a bridge too far.
The Starmer regime is currently trying to pass a law (Representation of the People Bill) that will give 16 & 17 year olds the right to vote in national elections.
Such a policy is obviously self-serving, as youth in Britain lean left-wing, but will they vote for the party that just banned them all from using social media?
The Green Party, Labor's biggest competitors, support the social media ban and demand stronger regulation (censorship) of social media companies.
The Starmer regime is currently trying to pass a law (Representation of the People Bill) that will give 16 & 17 year olds the right to vote in national elections.
Such a policy is obviously self-serving, as youth in Britain lean left-wing, but will they vote for the party that just banned them all from using social media?
The Green Party, Labor's biggest competitors, support the social media ban and demand stronger regulation (censorship) of social media companies.
House of Commons Library
Voting age
The UK Government has introduced a bill to make 16 the voting age for all elections. This briefing details the voting age for UK elections and the debate about lowering the voting age.
Digital ID through the back door.
UK government statement on forthcoming device- and OS-level "child safety" spyware and censorship (distinct from the under 16s social media ban I posted about earlier):
"Under the new plans, Big Tech companies like Apple and Google must activate built-in features or implement technical solutions on smartphones and tablets to detect and block nude images for children, the Prime Minister announced in a speech at London Tech Week today (Monday 8 June)."
"Adults will still be able to take, share or view nude content through an age verification process."
"If companies do not act within 3 months, the government will bring forward legislation to force them to activate the technology. This will include fines for companies. Nothing is off the table"
The Starmer regime will likely try to force these restrictions upon PC operating systems, such as Windows, and eventually ISPs.
Signal criticized the requirements as "dystopian" and explicitly called out the grooming gang coverup:
"The UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the UK be scanned on the presumption of nudity will not safeguard children. It endangers us all."
"We know that mass surveillance and censorship capabilities never remain narrowly scoped. Once created, they will be expanded, forming a dangerous tool that will be wielded both in the UK and abroad to censor and surveil whatever they might consider 'threats' or 'harmful content.' Its scope will be defined by the whims and proscriptions of the government to detect nudity today and political speech tomorrow."
Remember: Libtards and tradcucks in America are trying to implement similar totalitarian laws under the guise of "saving the children." See here and here.
UK government statement on forthcoming device- and OS-level "child safety" spyware and censorship (distinct from the under 16s social media ban I posted about earlier):
"Under the new plans, Big Tech companies like Apple and Google must activate built-in features or implement technical solutions on smartphones and tablets to detect and block nude images for children, the Prime Minister announced in a speech at London Tech Week today (Monday 8 June)."
"Adults will still be able to take, share or view nude content through an age verification process."
"If companies do not act within 3 months, the government will bring forward legislation to force them to activate the technology. This will include fines for companies. Nothing is off the table"
The Starmer regime will likely try to force these restrictions upon PC operating systems, such as Windows, and eventually ISPs.
Signal criticized the requirements as "dystopian" and explicitly called out the grooming gang coverup:
"The UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the UK be scanned on the presumption of nudity will not safeguard children. It endangers us all."
"We know that mass surveillance and censorship capabilities never remain narrowly scoped. Once created, they will be expanded, forming a dangerous tool that will be wielded both in the UK and abroad to censor and surveil whatever they might consider 'threats' or 'harmful content.' Its scope will be defined by the whims and proscriptions of the government to detect nudity today and political speech tomorrow."
Remember: Libtards and tradcucks in America are trying to implement similar totalitarian laws under the guise of "saving the children." See here and here.
Telegram
Thuletide
Digital Panopticon Update: UK government plans to ban social media for under 16s and install government spyware on every single phone.
Enforcing a social media ban will obviously require the entire adult population to have some form of digital identity,…
Enforcing a social media ban will obviously require the entire adult population to have some form of digital identity,…
Restore Britain's Rape Gang Inquiry Report has been released.
I've uploaded the PDF to Telegram and you can download it here.
I have not yet read the entire document, but many of the girls' horrifying testimonies have been posted on social media.
A lot of people need to face the death penalty for this — not just the perpetrators, but all of the government officials and employees who covered it up.
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2066873370239537189
I've uploaded the PDF to Telegram and you can download it here.
I have not yet read the entire document, but many of the girls' horrifying testimonies have been posted on social media.
A lot of people need to face the death penalty for this — not just the perpetrators, but all of the government officials and employees who covered it up.
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2066873370239537189